Mayor Reardon Puts Record Over Rhetoric

The Townie is an opinion website. The views expressed in this piece belong solely to the author, do not represent those held by The Townie, and should not be interpreted as objective or reported fact.

The Newburyport mayor’s race is underway. Mud is flying and campaign promises are cheap. But when I take a clear-eyed look at the record, only Sean Reardon’s actions demonstrate an ability to deliver on the issues that matter: schools, affordability and delivering value for residents.

Let’s start with our schools. Mayor Reardon worked as an educator and served on the School Committee. Today we have a strong partnership between the City and the school district because Reardon understands the school budget and recognizes that communities broadly benefit from good schools.

In contrast, Councillor McCauley said during the June 2024 budget hearing that schools “only benefit 20% of the residents” and that he believed we need to cut $1.5 million from the school budget. McCauley voted against the budget that year, without offering any amendments. 

This year McCauley floated the idea of diverting $300,000 of Chapter 70 funds already baked into the school budget to city expenses instead. Despite campaigning on financial acumen, McCauley never addressed how he expected that $300k loss to the school budget would be addressed. Staff cuts or tax increases to cover the gap?

Turning to affordable housing, under Reardon’s stewardship, Brown School redevelopment is underway with every unit designated affordable to seniors making far less than the average Newburyport income. Reardon also spearheaded the Senior Affordability Task Force to find more ways to target financial relief to seniors in need.

Time and again McCauley has stood in the way of progress. McCauley voted against sending out the Brown School RFI, holding up progress on lower cost housing for some of Newburyport’s longest term residents. He also opposed revised zoning for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). These small units added to existing properties provide “missing middle” housing for seniors and young people who struggle to afford to stay in Newburyport. McCauley voted against it.

And, of course, McCauley led the No for the Rec campaign – part of his long attempt to stymie resources for RYS, a city department that provides affordable community services and covers over half its operating costs through user fees (rather than taxes). Providing a home for one of our most cost-effective city departments is a smart investment in our city’s future.

Ultimately, McCauley is campaigning on the most common campaign promise since elections began: lower taxes. This is also the first promise broken when elected officials are faced with the reality of cutting valuable public services and the employees who deliver them – teachers, DPS, RYS staff, librarians.

McCauley is already talking out of both sides of his mouth. At a recent meet and greet, he said “No cuts!” but also admitted there may need to be “rightsizing.” Which is it? If you commit to nothing, you don’t have to deliver anything.

Finally, it’s about leadership. Reardon has relationships among neighboring communities, state and federal reps, the Governor’s office. We need these allies more than ever to secure funding and policy that benefits our city.

Reardon has shown a willingness to stand up for the overall health of the city. On the Whittier project he led the regional effort to avoid devastating consequences for municipal finances, and to address an outdated regional agreement and dysfunctional building process. 

During the run-up to the Whittier ballot question, McCauley was nowhere to be found. He did not ask a single question of the Whittier Superintendent during her presentation to the City Council and made minimal public comment on the matter.

Whittier is beginning another MSBA process. We need a mayor who will advocate for Newburyport, not someone who’d rather not get involved.

Leadership is executing on a vision. In his first term, Reardon has paved over 60 streets and sidewalks, secured funding for bulkhead repairs, completed Waterfront Park and new parking at Pioneer Park, broken ground on the rec center, progressed Waterfront West negotiations, and so much more. 

He has invested in maintenance and in growth — our city needs both to thrive. All of these initiatives will make Newburyport a more sustainable and livable city for generations to come.

What is McCauley’s vision for Newburyport? It seems simply to be “no” to progress. McCauley’s record shows a pattern of obstruction, delay and misplaced priorities. He votes against things: budgets, redevelopment projects, affordability initiatives. Rarely does he bring people together for something. 

As the editor of The Daily News commented about McCauley on the rec center project, “Folks should ask McCauley, what’s his plan? Simply saying the city needs to look outside the box and get creative…is a hollow and frankly, useless comment.” (Daily News Editorial, 1/5/2023)

Newburyport deserves a mayor who will solve problems, not stall them. A leader who sees opportunities to strengthen our community and takes action, rather than making excuses. On November 4, I’m voting on the candidates’ record. I’m voting for Sean Reardon.

Stacey Macmillan
Newburyport resident

Passionate about a local issue? We want to hear from you. Check out our submission guidelines.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Comments

5 responses to “Mayor Reardon Puts Record Over Rhetoric”

  1. Michael Sales Avatar
    Michael Sales

    I don’t agree with your conclusion, but it is well written and forcefully argued.

    The mayoralty race is a challenging one for me. I wouldn’t say that Mayor Reardon has done a “bad” job, but I do think that the law suit lodged against the city and remarks made in public session about his managerial style by people like retired city clerk, Richard Jones, have been concerning to me.

    I’m a great fan of Newburyport, and I’m also a taxpayer. Looking at Walt Thompson presentation about the costs of the proposed renovation to Frog Pond is another matter that causes me to be hesitant about re-electing Mr. Reardon.

  2. Stephen James Bresnahan Avatar
    Stephen James Bresnahan

    Great article Stacey, Thank you for laying this all out. Great points made!!

  3. Debora D'Ambrosio Avatar
    Debora D’Ambrosio

    I respectfully disagree.
    Spending tax dollars on frills and not addressing our water supply…shame

  4. Connie Preston Avatar
    Connie Preston

    As a Councillor, I fully understand the school budget and the benefits of a strong school system on all residents and the community. I am confident that all of the Councillors, including Councillor McCauley, understand that. However, we cannot afford everything while staying within the state mandate of only increasing taxes 2.5% year on year.
    It is a fact that we lost 6 teaching positions (13.5 positions across the city) this year because of the increases in the budget. We simply cannot continue to spend at this rate and not expect to have more cuts or an override in the future.
    Mayor Reardon is talking out of both sides of his mouth when he says we can afford the rec center and keep spending on schools at the same time. Not to mention the $68M (and growing) that we need for critical water and sewer infrastructure projects. I would argue that a great rec center and excellent schools without clean drinking water is a failure. We simply cannot afford to do everything. You can pretend that means that someone is anti-schools but it’s really just good fiscal management. We need to get the ship back on course and our spending under control.
    I want a new rec center, but I was against spending $8.3M on this rec center and I have also suggested cuts to schools. I didn’t make either of those decisions lightly and I most certainly don’t hate kids or fail to see the need to have excellent school systems. I made those decisions because we have to balance the budget, and the fiscal situation of the city is perilous.

  5. Warren Russo Avatar
    Warren Russo

    Anyone who believes the current “mayor” does anything for anyone but himself is either delusional or simply hasn’t been paying attention.

    Reardon’s “rec center” is primarily a pickleball court, currying favor with the pickleballers to get their votes.

    Meanwhile:
    – We have no lifeguards on the beach.
    – The boardwalk is splintering into disrepair.
    – Streets are in terrible shape all over town. Manholes were not raised when High St. and Storey Ave were repaved!
    – No storm drains on Plum Island create huge traffic hazard puddles.
    – Mayor mysogynist fired the female volunteer library workers, provoked confrontation with a senior female staffer, and precipitated an expensive lawsuit against the city for discrimination against a female staff member.
    – Taxes are going up to fund free housing for illegal aliens.
    Reardon is an uneducated, rude and self-serving incompetent whose only interest is himself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *