Make This Election About Issues, Not Rhetoric

The Townie is an opinion website. The views expressed in this piece belong solely to the author, do not represent those held by The Townie, and should not be interpreted as objective or reported fact.

If you are exhausted by the tone and tenor of this year’s local elections, you’re not alone. I think we’re all disappointed that the conversation has devolved into name calling and one-upmanship online and, at times, in the pages of our local news sources.

Elections get heated, and people get passionate. But when a writer in The Daily News accuses the entire LGBTQ+ community of Newburyport of indulging in the “superficial gloss of flag waving” and “gay privilege” because they aren’t (in his view) adequately outraged about a city personnel issue, things have gone too far.

Re-litigating grievances, settling old scores, and pointing fingers might be politically effective or personally gratifying, but they don’t serve our community as we make important decisions about who we elect to lead us. Even worse, these arguments are focused almost exclusively on the past, when we should be talking about the future.

For me, the antidote to the ugliness of all of this has been speaking with young people about local government at the high school and middle school. These students were highly engaged and asked thoughtful, timely questions. And they reminded us all why we must lay the foundation for a better Newburyport.

Our young people need our help to build a city they can afford to come home to if they choose to live, work, and raise their families here. The Kmart redevelopment has become a lightning rod when it could be an opportunity to have a serious conversation about investing in the future by replacing much-needed rental housing we’ve lost. Is the project perfect? No—it’s still a negotiation in progress. But it’s the right thing to do, and it creates a more affordable option for people looking to downsize or get their start in Newburyport. We have other tools available too, so we need to keep working on this issue—because the vibrant city my husband grew up in should never become a gated community that locks our children out.

Newburyport must also modernize its approach to transportation, so we can be a place where kids can safely bike to school and seniors can easily get around town. Projects like the one proposed on Hale Street or efforts to improve multimodal connections along Low Street aren’t just about recreation; they’re about accessibility and affordability for people who ride a bus or bike to get to work. They also create a climate-friendly network that connects our community and allows us to commit to a less car-centric future.

We all must take up the responsibility of being the generation that invests in protecting and upgrading our critical infrastructure—especially our water and sewer systems—so we’re building a resilient Newburyport for the next 50 years. Claiming that not enough has been done or that costs are too high, while blaming others for the problem, accomplishes nothing. Now is the time to create a clear roadmap for addressing our aging infrastructure. As leaders, we have a responsibility to do that work thoughtfully and transparently, because the last thing that should ever be politicized is access to clean drinking water.

Finally, it’s time to show our young people the power of a community that comes together—not only to solve problems and build for the future, but to lift one another up. Newburyport has a proud history of refusing to accept injustice—of practicing disobedience in the face of oppression and taking risks to make the world more equitable and fair. That work is never finished. I, for one, will continue showing up to support the vulnerable and unseen, because while a flag raising or a remembrance ceremony may seem merely symbolic to some, they are profoundly affirming and protective for those whose freedoms or right to exist are under attack.

When the tone of local politics starts to sound like national politics, something’s gone wrong—but we can always make it right. We’re neighbors who volunteer together. We cheer on our kids’ teams together. When a family or group is in need, we pool our resources together. And no matter what happens, after this election it will be our job to come together once again.

Local elections matter, and I believe in what we can do together. We can’t afford to get lost in the noise or distracted by division. So let’s dig in to do what we’ve always done best: working hard, listening closely, and putting people over politics so we can keep making progress together.

Ben Harman
Newburyport City Councilor, Ward 4
Candidate for City Council, At-large

Passionate about a local issue? We want to hear from you. Check out our submission guidelines.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Comments

6 responses to “Make This Election About Issues, Not Rhetoric”

  1. Second paragraph refers to my Daily News column of Oct.20. My line in question was a response to three heads of groups who had letters to the editor endorsing Reardon. Here it is:

    “With all due respect to the heads of local cultural enterprises of which I have been part, to the PEG Center which has a strong hand in the anti-Trump rallies in which I take part, and to the alliance called LGBTQ whose rights I fully endorse: None of what you say has anything to do with the inner workings of government.”

    Harman’s claim that this “accuses the entire LGBTQ+ community of Newburyport” without offering the actual quote is telling. The word “entire” is so inflated that I myself was wondering whom he meant. He, like Reardon and like Council President Cameron, cannot address the issues of the Clerk’s Office, the Library vols, the department heads. And so he points to the messenger with an insinuation.

    Meanwhile, the subjects I brought up–a record of serial incompetence–are dismissed as “old scores” and negativity and anger. And so the mantra is “move forward,” a phrase that Reardon and his supporters use constantly, and which Cameron has on his lawn signs.

    A phrase that allows them to feel good about cover ups, and a phrase that is now the Newburyport equivalent of the Republican Party’s “thoughts and prayers.”

    Um, by the way, the Clerk’s Office–which by charter reports to the council, not the mayor–still includes the long-time dedicated servants who beseeched the City Council to intervene in the “toxic work environment” created by Reardon. They are not “in the past,” and on Tuesday, the city may be deciding if it “moves forward” with them or in spite of them.

    1. Frank Moore Avatar
      Frank Moore

      It, looks like Mr. Garvey neglected to include the entire thread in question from his Oct 20 Daily News column. It was more than just one line. Here it is and take note of the last sentence. Maybe Mr. Garvey can clarify exactly what he meant to communicate with the last sentence below.

      ————————————————————————-

      Those endorsing the mayor for reelection always ring the bells of “moving forward” and “growth.” They praise Reardon for projects that were in the works long before he became mayor as if he alone made them happen. And they praise him for things yet to be built, much less prove any success.

      Endorsements also come from groups who emphasize his support for them.

      With all due respect to the heads of local cultural enterprises of which I have been part, to the PEG Center, which has a strong hand in the anti-Trump rallies in which I take part, and to the alliance called LGBTQ, whose rights I fully endorse:

      None of what you say has anything to do with the inner workings of government.

      Yes, he appears at your rallies, raises your flags, and smiles with you for cameras while handing you framed certificates proclaiming your goodness and worth.

      ————————————————————————–

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    The councillor may be pleased to know that many people see through the rhetoric, like this essay and the flood of Letters to the Editor.

    1. John Giordano Avatar
      John Giordano

      It’s interesting that comments like this usually sounds hollow, while coming from anonymous people who don’t have the conviction to put their name behind their words.

  3. John Giordano Avatar
    John Giordano

    Well said, Ben. This one has to be the most drama-filled local elections yet. I appreciate how you’re looking forward to the next generation. Let’s hear what youth have to say, and commit to creating a Newburyport they can afford to remain in should they choose to settle down where they grew up. We can spend all the money in the world on their education, but what have we really done for them if we price them out of their home town?

  4. Lisa Flynn Avatar
    Lisa Flynn

    Ben – your points about the young people of Newburyport and their needs are important. However you lose any credibility when you spend the first three paragraphs of your opinion piece by trashing those who disagree with the way the Mayor Reardon has governed. If you truly wanted to lessen the rhetoric, you would not have included your opening paragraphs. Do better if you want my vote.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *