Why Have We Made So Much of Newburyport Illegal?

The Townie is an opinion website. The views expressed in this piece belong solely to the author, do not represent those held by The Townie, and should not be interpreted as objective or reported fact.

Do you love Newburyport’s historic neighborhoods, with a mix of homes built over the centuries? How about some of our neighborhood fixtures like Olive’s Coffee & Bakehouse or The Natural Grocer? Did you know that every bit of this is illegal to build under Newburyport’s Zoning Ordinance?

Under our current laws, the only thing permitted to be built in the majority of the city is expensive single-family homes on large lots. This reflects a 1960’s suburban ideal that is completely out of place throughout much of our historic City.

First, let’s look at neighborhood businesses. According to the Newburyport Zoning Ordinance, “Neighborhood bakeries,” “Outdoor café[s]” and grocery stores are “Not Permitted” virtually anywhere other than our downtown core or the Port Plaza area. Olive’s and the Natural Grocer are allowed to exist only because they are “grandfathered” in, i.e., there have been businesses in those locations since before the Zoning Ordinance was passed, and so businesses are allowed to remain.

But there’s a catch: every business that operates in non-conformance with our Zoning Ordinance is living on borrowed time. If Olive’s or the Natural Grocer shut down for just two years, then there could never be another coffee shop, bakery, or neighborhood grocery store in those locations. This is not speculation; a walk through our City shows the signs of many neighborhood stores and hang-outs which have been lost to time and converted into the only thing that our Zoning Ordinance allows: expensive single-family homes. Check out some of the stories of great neighborhood hang-outs which used to exist, but which are now wholly illegal in our City.

Next, let’s look at housing. My own home is a great example, a two-family home built almost 200 years ago. I live in a dense, historic neighborhood where I know my neighbors, and where I feel safe letting my kids play at the local park. It is a desirable spot, and I feel fortunate that we bought here when we did.

Yet my home, in fact my entire neighborhood, would be illegal under the Zoning Ordinance, were it to be built today. Two-family homes are not “Permitted” by right anywhere in the City and instead have to receive a “Special Permit” to be allowed. Even then, the Ordinance requires a 15,000 square foot lot (mine is less than a third of that), with a 25 foot setback from the lot line (my setback is less than 4 feet), and 20 feet from the side lot lines (mine are both less than 7 feet), with 120 feet of frontage on the street (mine has only 53 feet). And the Ordinance requires 4 full parking spaces, which the original builders did not include 200 years ago. So no homes like mine or my neighbors’ can be built anywhere in Newburyport.

My home and neighborhood are not unique. Virtually every building built in Newburyport prior to 1970 is “non-conforming” under our current Zoning Ordinance. That includes almost every historic home or business in the City. Newburyport prides itself on its historic downtown, walkability, and sense of community, yet all of it is prohibited under current law.

Indeed, one of the major reasons that Newburyport is swiftly becoming unaffordable to all but the richest among us is our Zoning Ordinance. Especially outside of the downtown core, neighborhood businesses and multi-family residences are being replaced by large, expensive homes.

Consider 18 Highland Avenue, which is a medical office building where I used to take my son to his pediatrician. The office is located in a neighborhood with many residential houses that is also a stone’s throw from the high school and across the street from the hospital: central and convenient for all. The land has been sold, and the building is being razed, and because its use was illegal under our Zoning Ordinance, there will never again be any use for that property other than residential.

Nor will the residential building that is planned for 18 Highland Ave be consistent with the rest of the neighborhood. A private road is being built so that four large single-family homes can be built to the specifications of the Zoning Ordinance, with large lots, significant setbacks, and the frontages permitted by our Zoning Ordinance. Not a single one of those homes will likely be in any sense affordable for the average Newburyport family.

There is one bright spot. The plans show one of the homes as having an “Accessory Dwelling Unit” (ADU), a smaller home on the property that may be affordable. In 2025, the State compelled Newburyport and other communities throughout the State to allow for ADUs in their Zoning. And the inclusion here shows that where the rules allow for affordable houses to be built, developers will build them.

Overall though, due to our Zoning Ordinance, instead of building densely and affordably in a neighborhood walkable to downtown and just next to the High School, we are going to get a private drive with mainly McMansions straight out of suburbia. Nor is the developer to blame, they are simply building what our City allows, and because land in Newburyport is expensive, and our Zoning Ordinance requires a lot of it in order to build anything here, they build very expensive single-family homes. Nor can they, under the current Zoning, even consider building anything similar to the non-conforming homes that make up our current neighborhoods, or anything with city-like density, including the duplexes, cottage courts, and “missing middle” housing (i.e., not single-family homes or apartment complexes) that Newburyport so desperately needs and historically was able to build. When our Zoning allows for affordable housing to be built—as it now does for ADUs—developers build them.

But we are not doomed to simply accept our current Zoning Ordinance. It was enacted by our City government, and can be changed by our City government. If we want to see more great neighborhood coffee shops and grocery stores, more affordable housing, and fewer suburban-style McMansions, then we need to band together to advocate for the City that we want to see. Reach out to me; if enough of us come together, we can make sure that our beautiful City retains its history and charm for generations to come.

Jared Hubbard
Newburyport resident

Jared can be reached at jared.hubbard@gmail.com

Passionate about a local issue? We want to hear from you. Check out our submission guidelines.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Comments

5 responses to “Why Have We Made So Much of Newburyport Illegal?”

  1. Walt Thompson Avatar
    Walt Thompson

    Imagine a coffee/tea/biscuit shop in every Ward.
    Oh my!!!

  2. I didn’t do it
    I’m just one of many wondering why everyone who’s not the many seem so unphased until I learned how many people as new residents didn’t even know they had a right to public comment on any agenda item – and then I think of people living in a home that they don’t even know was approved by a piece of paper over actual work to remediate the real issue by the board of health and I sit and wonder – am I really newburyports problem child ? Bc I was a great kid a very good mother a hard worker I am honest – I don’t steal I don’t lie I don’t play ignorant to facts I know are very. Much facts – and in response to anyone who looks at me like IM the issue – don’t give me that credit
    An issue for a fact is alive and thriving no doubt – I am not that arrogant to take credit for something that others did and a small hand full of care here still bothers to even mention anything. For me now even writing this I just got off a 24 hour shift put two kids into their schools – handled three loads of laundry and yesterday called a state auditor to ask a real viable question if they’re looking for state compliance why they can’t have city’s voting for the same audit offer their own and cost nothing to us ? And I really wanted to just shower and shave my legs – but I realized I show up and not everyone is gonna like that
    And I outgrew my desire to care about that
    Maybe this city needs to use its lucrative advantage to make real change it’s more than broke city’s can do but broke city’s are factually doing better – it’s not an opinion that’s a fact I can provide the date for – but this ain’t a podcast you won’t pay me for it and I certainly am one who’s paying for your zoning planning and mbta everything act lack of oversite- and when they thought I was at a developer for the money actually look at the towns refusing that zoning now – I grew up there – they listened and Newburyport truly didn’t care

  3. James Higgins Avatar
    James Higgins

    For anyone seeking “city – like density” in Nbpt’s zoning rules don’t hold your breath.
    The desirability of this community has much to do with the current zoning laws on the books, like that fact -or not!
    If you really want smaller yards and homes situated on top of each other, the Merrimac Valley has plenty of communities up river that support your needs.

  4. This is a bad take.

    Why would we want density? People move here for the small town feel, the quaint water ways and the ability to trust your neighbors and to walk around late at night safely and take in beautiful views. Who wants businesses all over (because spoiler alert; once you rezone for businesses it’s not like you get to choose if it’s a cute little cafe or natural grocer or if it’s a run down dominos or smoke shop) and tight plots where you can’t mow your lawn or bbq outside without having your neighbors listen to your conversations cause they’re 10 feet away from a chain link fence.

    Move to Salisbury beach if you want to live in a run down city with businesses and people living all on top of one another.

  5. John Ricci Avatar
    John Ricci

    I am with you Jared. I think there is definitely a space between what is now and what can be. The mansionization of Newburyport robs the city of its character and also does not lend itself to affordability. Like everything else, there should be a common ground between multi-family homes and what is going to happen on 18 Highland. Hopefully, with your push, the builders/developers’ desires, and accommodating some continued affordability in the city, we will all find that midway point.

Leave a Reply to James Higgins Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *