MA question 5 poster

Vote NO on Question 5, or say goodbye to your favorite restaurants  

As someone who has worked in the restaurant industry for 19 years, I feel uncertain and uneasy about the future of small businesses and restaurants in the state of Massachusetts if Question 5 passes. In theory, it sounds like a wonderful thing: More money in the pockets of servers and bartenders. Unfortunately that is not the case.

As many restaurant patrons may not be aware, there is already a tip credit in Massachusetts that ensures an employee receives a minimum of $16 an hour if their tips don’t add up to it. If we have to bump pay to $16 an hour, the cost of dining out in our beloved city of Newburyport will be outrageous, as restaurants will be forced to raise prices to offset the extra expense. We’re talking $25 drinks and $30 burgers. If things do get to that point, people will likely stop dining out as often, meaning tips will dwindle and servers and bartenders will make significantly less. This would have a broader impact on the local economy, too; as restaurants become less affordable and attractive, fewer people will come downtown altogether, impacting shops and other businesses in the community.  If the city isn’t making as much money from the business’ taxes, they will have to raise an already high property tax. As you can see, the ripple effect of this ballot question could be truly devastating.

With question 5 also comes a stipulation that a manager can now split tips with everyone as they see fit with no guidelines. This will create animosity inside the restaurants and ultimately skilled workers will leave the industry or go work in other states. Service standard and quality will plummet, date nights will become fewer and farther between, and an after work drink on a Friday will cost more than double. I came into this industry and grew to love it because I know I can make someone’s bad day just a little brighter; I can help someone take a celebration or birthday and make it just a little more special. If this passes, special occasions and dining just won’t be the same.

My dad always says, “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.” I would usually roll my eyes at him, but this time it’s true.

Vote NO on Question 5.

Nicholas Miller-Garringer
General Manager, Paddle Inn

Passionate about a local issue? We want to hear from you. Check out our submission guidelines.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Comments

3 responses to “Vote NO on Question 5, or say goodbye to your favorite restaurants  ”

  1. Townie441 Avatar

    When someone says something dramatic and sensational like “or say goodbye to your favorite restaurant” , my gut reaction is to do exactly the opposite of what they’re demanding.

  2. It seems everyone in the restaurant industry is against this, and they are the only people it directly impacts so why not vote as they are pleading ?

  3. Foodie73 Avatar

    Unlike Townie441, my “gut reaction” supports the words of this professional in the hospitality industry. My reaction comes from my personal career in the hospitality industry.

    Now retired, my work experience, expertise, and education as a graduate of the Culinary Institute of America and the School of Hospitality and Travel at Florida International University aligns with the opinion expressed by Mr. Miller-Garringer. There is nothing dramatic or sensational about the headline or the body of information he puts forward. With the current pay structure, the average restaurant is lucky to make a 4 to 6 % net income. Requiring restaurants to meet a minimum pay rate without a gratuity credit will not only increase menu prices, but will also decrease the income of those working “front of the house.”

    Servers and bartenders always pocketed more per hour than I did as a manager. As a salaried employee, I worked longer hours for less money, but the tradeoff was in benefits. I had health insurance, sick leave and paid vacation. Servers and bartenders did not. It was a choice I made.

    The impact of Question 5 will be detrimental to “front of house” employees and restaurant owners alike. Service positions will no longer provide a livable income, especially in an area with a high cost of living, such as Newburyport. There is nothing in this proposal to provide benefits to offset the decrease in income. Please base your vote on an understanding of the full repercussions of this ballot question, not a gut reaction triggered by a headline.

Leave a Reply to Sarah Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *