America 250: What Unites Us is More Important Than What Divides Us

The Townie is an opinion website. The views expressed in this piece belong solely to the author, do not represent those held by The Townie, and should not be interpreted as objective or reported fact.

Flag Day (June 14) is also the US Army’s birthday. It’s easy to forget the latter since it is both overshadowed by Flag Day and pales in comparison to the pomp and circumstance that accompanies the US Marine Corps birthday celebrations every November. Marines have always had better public relations and snazzier uniforms than the Army, so while as an Army veteran I’m a little jealous, I nevertheless can’t find it in me to be too resentful, since both my late father and my best man at my wedding were Marines.

As we draw near to the 250th birthday of these United States, though, it seems more pressing to reflect on the Army’s birthday as well — and to consider afresh what exactly it is that American soldiers fight for. Fortunately, the US Army has eliminated any doubt with the Soldier’s Creed, which reads in part: “I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat. I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.”

But what is “the American way of life”?

Fortunately, our Founding Fathers eliminated any doubt about that as well when they signed and published the Declaration of Independence. While other nations’ ways of life were and are grounded in a common racial and ethnic heritage, the distinctively American way of life is uniquely grounded in a set of common beliefs to which any person of any race or ethnicity could potentially (but does not automatically) adhere: that people possess inalienable rights endowed by their Creator, and that the purpose of government is to secure those God-given rights subject to the consent of citizens.

Yet affirming these beliefs alone is insufficient to secure the rights for which they serve as a foundation. To “establish justice” and “secure the blessings of Liberty” for themselves, the founding generation ordained and established the Rule of Law in the form of the Constitution of the United States – so that authentic government by “The People” would reign. For this reason, the oaths of both Commissioned Officers and of Enlistment contain the clauses, “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same… So help me God.”

Taken together, the Declaration, the Constitution, and the military oath reveal something important about the American experiment. Freedom is not merely inherited. It must also be understood, preserved, and transmitted. Every generation receives a political inheritance it did not create, and every generation must decide whether it will steward that inheritance faithfully or allow it to erode through neglect, confusion, or indifference.

Public discussion often focuses on what divides us. Yet the survival of a constitutional republic ultimately depends upon what unites us. Neither the founding generation nor any generation since have agreed on every question of the day. Yet a shared belief in the principles underpinning “the American way of life” has always made civil discourse and self-government possible.

How can we fittingly honor those who have for 250 years by their actions and who still today affirm by their creed their willingness to leave their families and homeland, to place themselves in harm’s way, and to do violence on our behalf so “that this nation, under God… and that government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth?”

Fortunately, President Abraham Lincoln eliminated any doubt about that in his Gettysburg Address when he said, “It is for us … to be dedicated here to the unfinished work … [and] take increased devotion … [and] highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain.” Or, as the Founders put it, “with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence” let our generation increase our devotion to faithfully stewarding for our posterity these blessings of liberty – “So help us God.”

Markus Fish
Newburyport resident

Passionate about a local issue? We want to hear from you. Check out our submission guidelines.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Comments

6 responses to “America 250: What Unites Us is More Important Than What Divides Us”

  1. I used to believe–and fervently wish to again–that what united Americans was a shared set of principles. Yet the last 50 years have seen an active erosion of that unity. I fear it may be too late to reverse that.

  2. Sean McElroy Avatar
    Sean McElroy

    That any form of unity evolved out of the Decl. of Indep. is worthy of great praise after 250 years. The 13 Colonies had at that time agreed to become individual states independent from Great Britain. They had not yet organized into what we think of as the USA. The Continental Army was an afterthought as no way could Massachusetts defend New York against Britain on its own nor were they particularly inclined to do so at the time. Washington from Virginia was able to cobble together enough of an army to keep Britain at bay. Paying for the upkeep of the army was a pressing concern that ultimately unified the 13 states to agreeing to a constitution establishing the United States. And even that didn’t last long: turned out the individual states all had individual interests not all of which conformed to the nascent Constitution. We have been fighting amongst ourselves about what truly constitutes the United States ever since. And long may we continue to do so.

  3. Charlie D Avatar
    Charlie D

    This essay hits on something urgent: that every generation inherits a political legacy they didn’t build, yet are responsible for protecting. In my lifetime, that inheritance has been under sustained attack.

    After the assassinations of the 1960s stalled progress, the Powell Memo arrived in 1971 — a strategic blueprint for reshaping American power structures. Its tactics were implemented in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and dramatically accelerated after September 11, 2001.

    Too many see the result: deep national decline across civic, social, cultural, material, and economic dimensions. Like commenter NLK, I worry that we’ve reached a point where reform cannot restore what’s been lost.

    Our republic derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed. It’s worth remembering what colonists decided 250 years ago when their government became irredeemable. They chose independence over allegiance to a failing system.

    On this anniversary, I think we owe ourselves clear-eyed examination: if the republic’s framework has truly been sabotaged beyond repair, does loyalty mean preserving something already broken — or does fidelity demand something different?

  4. Joseph H. Devlin Avatar
    Joseph H. Devlin

    Markus, thank you for your service and Haooy Fourth. The genius of our system of government is that you don’t need to throw out the system to get something new or different. Our system of government can change course peacefully every local, state or federal term of office. It’s hard work, but it’s possible. Our history – both my lived one and the one we can all read about in books – is filled with examples of our country’s political adaptability, constantly experimenting and changing in pursuit of a more perfect union. My take away from this piece is that it takes an appreciation of our founding and history, dedication to the principles of self-determination, hard work and sacrifice to live up to the ideals of those that came before us. Thanks for sharing, Markus, and making me think this Fourth of July morning.

  5. Stay with me here. If there is one upside to the current tumult of political and social dynamics in this country, forced by until-now unthinkable actions of a few, is that I sense a greater examination and consideration of the document signed 250 years ago and its meaning and relevance in today’s world. Resilience is key to our future, and the American public, in both large and small ways and gestures, has demonstrated such behavior to date. Let’s keep it up and remain solid, resilient until we drive it home and drive them out on November 3.

  6. Chip Wyser Avatar
    Chip Wyser

    It was our responsibility to make social change permanent. We, the Boomers FAILED. NOW it’s up to Gen Z to pick up the ball.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *